AI Work Central

AI training glossary

AI training jobs use a lot of shorthand. These are plain definitions of the terms you will meet in postings, guidelines and screenings, written for people new to the work.

Adversarial prompt

A prompt written to expose a model's weak spots, such as tricky reasoning, misleading premises or edge cases.

Related: Red teaming, Stump the model

AI interview

A screening interview run by an AI system instead of a person, usually spoken or on video, with questions about your background and skills.

Related: Assessment

Annotation

Adding labels or notes to data such as text, images, audio or video so a model can learn from it.

Related: Labeling, Bounding box, Ground truth

Assessment

Any screening step a platform uses before giving you work: a quiz, a skills test, a language test, a writing sample or an AI interview.

Related: Qualification test, AI interview

Benchmark

A fixed set of test tasks used to compare models or track progress over time.

Related: Model evaluation, Golden set

Bounding box

A rectangle drawn around an object in an image or video frame to mark where it is.

Related: Annotation, Segmentation

Calibration

Exercises where raters do the same tasks and compare results with the expected answers, so everyone applies the guidelines the same way.

Related: Golden set, Inter-rater agreement

Chain of thought

The step-by-step reasoning a model writes before its final answer. Some tasks ask you to check each step, not only the result.

Related: Process supervision

A document you sign agreeing to how your recordings, images or other data will be used, for example to train or synthesize voices.

Related: Data collection

Data collection

Projects where you create new data, such as photos, videos, recordings or written samples, instead of judging existing data.

Related: Speech data, Consent form

Demonstration data

Example answers written by people to show the model what an ideal response looks like. It is the main input for SFT.

Related: SFT, Golden response

Domain expert

Someone hired for professional knowledge in a field, such as law, medicine or engineering, to write or judge expert-level tasks.

Related: Stump the model, Rubric

Edge case

An unusual item the guidelines do not clearly cover. Projects usually ask you to flag it rather than guess.

Related: Guidelines

Fact-checking

Checking each claim in a model's answer against reliable sources and marking what is wrong or unsupported.

Related: Hallucination, Grounding

Golden response

A model answer written or rewritten by an expert to be the best possible reply to a prompt.

Related: Demonstration data, Rewrite

Golden set

A set of tasks with answers already agreed by experts, mixed into your queue to measure accuracy and consistency.

Related: Quality check, Calibration

Ground truth

The correct answer or label that model output is compared against.

Related: Golden set, Annotation

Grounding

Whether an answer is supported by a given source, such as a document, search result or retrieved passage.

Related: Hallucination, RAG

Guidelines

The project's written instructions that define how to do a task and how to judge answers. On most projects they take precedence over personal preference.

Related: Rubric, Edge case

Hallucination

When a model states something false or made up as if it were true, such as a fake citation or an invented fact.

Related: Fact-checking, Grounding

Harm categories

The named types of harmful content a project tracks, such as hate speech, dangerous instructions or medical misinformation.

Related: Safety policy, Red teaming

Hourly rate

Pay set per hour worked, usually tracked by a timer or time log on the platform. A listed rate is not a promise of hours.

Related: Pay per task

Instruction following

Whether a model did exactly what was asked, including constraints such as length, format, language or things to avoid.

Related: Rubric, System prompt

Inter-rater agreement

How often different raters give the same judgement on the same item. Low agreement usually means unclear guidelines or inconsistent work.

Related: Calibration, Rubric

Jailbreak

A prompt designed to get a model to ignore its safety rules, for example by role-play or by hiding the real request.

Related: Red teaming, Adversarial prompt

Labeling

Assigning a category or tag to an item, for example marking a review as positive or negative. Often used as a synonym for annotation.

Related: Annotation, Taxonomy

Likert scale

A scale of ordered options, such as strongly disagree to strongly agree, used for ratings.

Related: Rating scale

Locale

A specific language and region combination, such as Spanish for Mexico or Portuguese for Brazil. Many language roles are tied to one locale.

Related: Localization

Localization

Adapting content to a specific language and culture, including units, dates, idioms and references, not just translating words.

Related: Locale, Post-editing

Model evaluation

Testing how well a model performs on a set of tasks, often by people scoring answers against a rubric.

Related: Rubric, Benchmark

Native proficiency

Command of a language at the level of someone who grew up speaking it, which many language roles require.

Related: Locale

Pairwise comparison

A preference task with exactly two answers, where you pick the better one or mark them as equal, sometimes on a scale.

Related: Preference ranking, Likert scale

Pay per task

Pay set per completed item rather than per hour, so actual earnings depend on your speed and on task availability.

Related: Hourly rate

Post-editing

Correcting machine-translated text so it reads accurately and naturally.

Related: Localization, Rewrite

Preference ranking

A task where you see two or more model answers to the same prompt and order them from best to worst, usually with a short reason.

Related: Pairwise comparison, RLHF, Rationale

Process supervision

Judging each step of a model's reasoning rather than only the final answer, common in maths, science and coding work.

Related: Chain of thought

Project pause

When a project stops sending tasks, sometimes for days or permanently. Common in AI training work and a reason pay is not guaranteed.

Related: Task queue

Prompt

The input given to a model: a question, an instruction or a conversation so far.

Related: Prompt writing, System prompt

Prompt writing

Creating realistic or challenging prompts for a model, often with a target answer or rubric, to build training or test data.

Related: Prompt, Stump the model

Qualification test

A test you must pass before you can work on a project. It usually checks that you understood the guidelines on a set of sample tasks.

Related: Assessment, Guidelines

Quality check

Any review of your work by a reviewer, an automated test or a golden set. Many projects use quality scores to decide who keeps getting tasks.

Related: Golden set, Reviewer

RAG (Retrieval-augmented generation)

A setup where the model first retrieves documents and then writes an answer based on them. Raters often check whether the answer actually follows the sources.

Related: Grounding

Rating scale

A fixed scale such as 1 to 5 or 1 to 7 used to score answers on one or more criteria.

Related: Likert scale, Rubric

Rationale

The short written explanation you give for a rating or ranking. Reviewers often weigh it as much as the rating itself.

Related: Preference ranking, Rubric

Red teaming

Deliberately trying to make a model produce harmful, false or policy-breaking output, so the weaknesses can be found and fixed.

Related: Jailbreak, Adversarial prompt, Safety policy

Relevance

How well a result or answer matches what the user was looking for.

Related: Search quality rating, User intent

Reviewer

A more experienced worker who checks other people's tasks, gives feedback and scores quality.

Related: Quality check

Reward model

A separate model trained on human preference judgements that predicts how a person would score an answer. It is used to steer the main model during RLHF.

Related: RLHF, Preference ranking

Rewrite

A task where you fix a model's answer so it is correct, complete and follows the guidelines, instead of only scoring it.

Related: Golden response

RLHF (Reinforcement learning from human feedback)

A way of improving a model by having people compare or score its answers, training a reward model on those judgements, then tuning the model to produce answers people prefer.

Related: Reward model, Preference ranking, SFT

Rubric

A written list of criteria and scores used to judge a response, for example accuracy, instruction following and tone, each with clear pass or fail descriptions.

Related: Guidelines, Rating scale, Inter-rater agreement

Safety policy

The rules that define what a model must refuse or handle carefully, such as self-harm, violence or illegal activity.

Related: Red teaming, Harm categories

Search quality rating

Judging how useful and relevant search results, ads or map results are for a given query, following long rater guidelines.

Related: Relevance, User intent

Segmentation

Marking the exact outline of objects in an image, pixel by pixel, rather than with a box.

Related: Bounding box, Annotation

SFT (Supervised fine-tuning)

Training a model on examples of good prompts and ideal answers written or checked by people, so it learns the expected format and quality.

Related: RLHF, Demonstration data

Speech data

Recordings of people speaking, collected to train or test speech recognition and voice models. Projects usually set rules for setup, noise and script reading.

Related: Transcription, Data collection

Stump the model

A task where you write a hard question the model gets wrong and record the correct answer, often used in expert STEM and coding projects.

Related: Adversarial prompt, Ground truth

System prompt

Hidden instructions given to a model before the user's message, setting its role, tone or rules.

Related: Prompt, Instruction following

Talent pool

A list of approved people a platform can invite when a matching project opens. Joining one does not mean work is available yet.

Related: Project pause

Task queue

The list of tasks available to you on a project. It can empty out without warning when a project pauses or ends.

Related: Project pause

Taxonomy

The fixed list of categories a project uses for labeling, often with definitions and examples for each.

Related: Labeling, Guidelines

Timestamping

Marking the start and end times of words, sentences or speakers in a recording.

Related: Transcription

Transcription

Writing down exactly what is said in an audio or video recording, following the project's rules for spelling, fillers, noise and speaker changes.

Related: Timestamping, Speech data

User intent

What a person actually wants when they type a query or prompt, which may differ from the literal words.

Related: Relevance

See the terms in use: interview prep by role and the open roles.